LIBOR’s Slow Phase-Out Continues
LIBOR is still being retired, just a little later than initially expected.
LIBOR stands for the London Interbank Offered Rate, but in fact there are many LIBOR rates, spanning multiple currencies and multiple maturities. These rates are important for investors and consumer borrowers alike, as many loans are referenced to various LIBOR rates. In 2017, the regulatory agency that oversees LIBOR announced that the rates would be retired at the end of 2021.
However, that deadline has mostly been pushed back. Most U.S. dollar-denominated LIBOR maturity tenors will continue to be published until June 30, 2023, but banks are still encouraged to stop entering into new contracts by that initial December 31, 2021 date. Below we’ll discuss the rationale, and what it means for investors.
On November 30, 2020, the ICE Benchmark Association announced1 its intention to cease publication of two specific LIBOR rates while pushing back the timeline for LIBOR rates with other maturities:
- The one-week and two-month U.S. dollar-denominated (USD) LIBOR rates will retire on December 31, 2021.
- The overnight, one-month, three-month, six-month, and 12-month USD LIBOR rates will continue to be published through June 30, 2023.
The extension of the various LIBOR maturities listed above is for legacy contracts or products only. A “legacy contract” is one that’s already been written with a LIBOR rate. After December 31, 2021, there should be no new LIBOR-based originations, even though the rate will likely be published into 2023 based on guidance from bank regulators. According to a joint statement2 from the Federal Reserve, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the “agencies encourage banks to cease entering into new contracts that use USD LIBOR as a reference rate as soon as practicable and in any event by December 31, 2021, in order to facilitate an orderly—and safe and sound—LIBOR transition.”
This announcement likely provides flexibility for many legacy LIBOR contracts. By pushing back the retirement date for many LIBOR tenors, this will allow many of these contracts to simply mature as scheduled, without having them be renegotiated and shifted to a new rate. This point was supported by Federal Reserve Vice Chairman for Supervision Randall Quarles’ testimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking on November 10, 2020.
On the bright side, since the LIBOR retirement was initially announced, many LIBOR-based contracts continued to be written, but the contracts started using fallback language for when LIBOR was no longer a viable benchmark. The presence of the fallback language should help lead to an orderly transition for those LIBOR-based contracts once they do officially retire.
What does this mean for investors?
Three-month LIBOR is a common reference rate for many types of fixed income investments like floating-rate notes, preferred securities, and bank loans. While many of these investments have already have begun to switch over to different reference rates, like the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR), there are still plenty of investments that are still referencing LIBOR rates, and they might not have fallback language written into the prospectuses. If there’s uncertainty about what reference rate to use for a given security if its benchmark is no longer available, liquidity could dry up. Liquidity is the measure of how easily a security can be sold without incurring high transaction costs or a reduction in price. When there’s less liquidity for a given investment, the price at which the investment is sold might not reflect its true value.
- Investment-grade floating rate notes. Also called “floaters,” these are bonds issued by investment grade-rated corporations whose coupon rates “float” based on a short-term benchmark like three-month LIBOR. Floaters tend to have investment-grade credit ratings. This extension helps provide a more orderly transition for the investment-grade floating-rate note market.
Investment-grade floaters tend to have relatively short-term maturities. By our calculations, roughly 74% of all outstanding floaters are scheduled to mature before June 30, 2023, but only 36% would mature before the end of 2021.3 In other words, allowing three-month LIBOR to continue to be published through June 30, 2023 allows most of the floater universe to mature before the benchmark disappears. Floaters that mature beyond June 20, 2023 and are referenced to LIBOR without explicit fallback language could face liquidity challenges, however. Investors who own individual floaters should be cognizant of what the reference rate is, and if it’s LIBOR, whether there’s explicit fallback language.
- Preferred securities. The transition away from LIBOR poses more of a challenge to the preferred securities market given their very long maturity dates, or no maturity dates at all. As a result, preferreds can’t necessarily navigate the transition by simply letting outstanding securities mature.
Many recently issued floating- or variable-rate preferreds still use three-month LIBOR as a reference rate, but they generally have explicit fallback language in the case the rate is not available. Many seasoned preferreds—those that have been outstanding for years—likely do not have explicit fallback language and there’s plenty of ambiguity about what happens when the referenced benchmark rate is no longer available.
Given this uncertainty, LIBOR-based preferred securities that don’t have explicit fallback language could be at risk of reduced liquidity. In the bond market, lower liquidity usually leads to a large gap between what a bond can be bought or sold for, and usually leads to more price volatility. This could negatively affect holders of these types of investments.
- Bank loans. Bank loans are niche investments that are generally held by institutional investors. Like investment-grade floaters, bank loans are generally short-term in nature, so many will mature before LIBOR is retired. Bank loans may also be called at the issuer’s option, so issuers can choose to retire them early. As they are generally institutional investments, it’s less cumbersome for the issuer to negotiate a change in the underlying benchmark, because they are dealing with a relatively small number of investors. Since individual investors can generally only invest in bank loans through mutual funds or exchange-traded funds (ETFs), it’s up the fund managers to navigate these changing market conditions.
The bottom line
Pushing back the retirement date of key LIBOR rates will likely mitigate some of the negative consequences that might have occurred for many outstanding LIBOR contracts. But this extension of the retirement date doesn’t mean investors should be complacent now. Take this time to examine your individual holdings and figure out a plan, rather than waiting until we get closer to the actual retirement date.
For ETF and mutual fund investors, it will be up to the funds’ managers to do their own due diligence on the underlying holdings. On the bright side, we have colleagues at Schwab who are looking into the LIBOR retirement and how various mutual funds and ETFs are navigating the transition. For more information, please visit the “LIBOR Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)” page at schwab.com/libor.
1 “ICE Benchmark Administration to Consult on Its Intention to Cease the Publication of One Week and Two Month USD LIBOR Settings at End-December 2021, and the Remaining USD LIBOR Settings at End-June 2023,” November 30, 2020, TheIce.com
2 “Statement on LIBOR Transition,” November 30, 2020, Federal Reserve
3 Source: Schwab Center for Financial Research with data from Bloomberg. We screened for all U.S. dollar-denominated corporate floaters with investment grade ratings by S&P and at least $100 million outstanding. Our screen yielded a total of 782 floaters.
The information provided here is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered an individualized recommendation or personalized investment advice. The investment strategies mentioned here may not be suitable for everyone. Each investor needs to review an investment strategy for his or her own particular situation before making any investment decision.
All expressions of opinion are subject to change without notice in reaction to shifting market or economic conditions. Data contained herein from third party providers is obtained from what are considered reliable sources. However, its accuracy, completeness or reliability cannot be guaranteed.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results and the opinions presented cannot be viewed as an indicator of future performance.
Indexes are unmanaged, do not incur management fees, costs and expenses and cannot be invested in directly. For more information on indexes please see www.schwab.com/indexdefinitions.
Diversification strategies do not ensure a profit and do not protect against losses in declining markets.
Fixed income securities are subject to increased loss of principal during periods of rising interest rates. Fixed-income investments are subject to various other risks including changes in credit quality, market valuations, liquidity, prepayments, early redemption, corporate events, tax ramifications and other factors. Lower-rated securities are subject to greater credit risk, default risk, and liquidity risk.
Preferred securities are often callable, meaning the issuing company may redeem the security at a certain price after a certain date. Such call features may affect yield. Preferred securities generally have lower credit ratings and a lower claim to assets than the issuer's individual bonds. Like bonds, prices of preferred securities tend to move inversely with interest rates, so they are subject to increased loss of principal during periods of rising interest rates. Investment value will fluctuate, and preferred securities, when sold before maturity, may be worth more or less than original cost. Preferred securities are subject to various other risks including changes in interest rates and credit quality, default risks, market valuations, liquidity, prepayments, early redemption, deferral risk, corporate events, tax ramifications, and other factors.
The Schwab Center for Financial Research is a division of Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.
Thumbs up / down votes are submitted voluntarily by readers and are not meant to suggest the future performance or suitability of any account type, product or service for any particular reader and may not be representative of the experience of other readers. When displayed, thumbs up / down vote counts represent whether people found the content helpful or not helpful and are not intended as a testimonial. Any written feedback or comments collected on this page will not be published. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. may in its sole discretion re-set the vote count to zero, remove votes appearing to be generated by robots or scripts, or remove the modules used to collect feedback and votes.